Search for collections on Undip Repository

EVALUATION OF ANTHRAX INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM IN MAROS REGENCY, SOUTH SULAWESI PROVINCE (Study in the Human and Animal Health Sectors)

AZZAHRA, Nur Azizah and Sutiningsih, Dwi and Adi, M. Sakundarno (2023) EVALUATION OF ANTHRAX INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM IN MAROS REGENCY, SOUTH SULAWESI PROVINCE (Study in the Human and Animal Health Sectors). Masters thesis, UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO.

[img] Text
1. COVER.pdf

Download (724kB)
[img] Text
2. CHAPTER I.pdf

Download (160kB)
[img] Text
3. CHAPTER II.pdf

Download (335kB)
[img] Text
4. CHAPTER III.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (405kB)
[img] Text
5. CHAPTER IV.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (267kB)
[img] Text
6. CHAPTER V.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (1MB)
[img] Text
7. CHAPTER VI.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (243kB)
[img] Text
8. CHAPTER VII.pdf

Download (31kB)
[img] Text
9. BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf

Download (244kB)
[img] Text
10. APPENDIX.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (2MB)

Abstract

Background: Integrated surveillance evaluation in Maros had not conducted simultaneously involving human and animal health sectors.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate anthrax integrated surveillance program in Maros.
Research Method: This descriptive study used quantitative and qualitative approaches involving seven key informants and 52 additional informants. Quantitative data were analyzed univariately, and qualitative data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
Research Results: Input aspect shows agencies with human resources met the standards, namely 8/9 (training<75%). TGC are available at CHCs and Health Office. Agencies with adequate data management, communication, transportation, PPE, and funding, namely 3/9.0/9.5/9.8/9, and 7/9. Confirmation laboratories are BBLK and BBVet Maros. Adequate guidelines, and forms comparison, namely 4/9, and 8/9. There is legislation, coordination with government and farmers, networking, and contingencies. Activity aspect shows data collection and validation comparison, namely 9/9; and 8/9. Agency has adequate delivery capacity, with culture, PCMB, and PCR. Data analysis comparison, namely 7/9. Epidemiological studies, warnings, raising awareness, verification, investigation, feedback (100%), and information sharing were conducted optimally, while those that were not were reporting, response, dissemination, collaboration, and meetings. Output aspect shows that completeness of reporting, cases reporting, and timeliness were>90%.
Conclusion: The nonoptimal input and process components, namely human resources, training, data management, communication, transportation, PPE, funding, guidelines, forms, legislation, coordination, networking, validation, data analysis, reporting, response, information dissemination, cross-border meetings, and collaboration.
Keywords: Anthrax, Surveillance, HR, Logistics, Guidelines, Forms, Funding, Laboratories, Networking, Legislation, Relationship with Stakeholders, Data Collection, Validation, Analysis, Confirmation, Reporting, Preparedness, Response, Information Dissemination, Coordination, Completeness, Timeliness

Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Anthrax, Surveillance, HR, Logistics, Guidelines, Forms, Funding, Laboratories, Networking, Legislation, Relationship with Stakeholders, Data Collection, Validation, Analysis, Confirmation, Reporting, Preparedness, Response, Information Dissemination, Coordination, Completeness, Timeliness
Subjects: Public Health
Divisions: Postgraduate Program > Master Program in Epidemiology
Depositing User: ekana listianawati
Date Deposited: 21 Jul 2023 04:27
Last Modified: 21 Jul 2023 04:27
URI: https://eprints2.undip.ac.id/id/eprint/14898

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item