WIDIANTO, Eko Didik and Hadiyanto, Hadiyanto and Mantoro, Teddy (2026) MODEL EVALUASI DAN PENGEMBANGAN JURNAL INDONESIA BERBASIS BIBLIOMETRIK DAN ANP-TOPSIS. Doctoral thesis, UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO.

	Text cover aja.pdf Download (246kB)
	Text 01_30000320510025-Eko_Didik_Widianto-Disertasi-Jurnal_Indonesia-2026-Pembuka.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (12MB)
	Text 02_30000320510025-Eko_Didik_Widianto-Disertasi-Jurnal_Indonesia-2026-Bab_1.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text 03_30000320510025-Eko_Didik_Widianto-Disertasi-Jurnal_Indonesia-2026-Bab_2.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text 04_30000320510025-Eko_Didik_Widianto-Disertasi-Jurnal_Indonesia-2026-Bab_3.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (2MB)
	Text 05_30000320510025-Eko_Didik_Widianto-Disertasi-Jurnal_Indonesia-2026-Bab_4.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB)
	Text 06_30000320510025-Eko_Didik_Widianto-Disertasi-Jurnal_Indonesia-2026-Bab_5.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB)
	Text 07_30000320510025-Eko_Didik_Widianto-Disertasi-Jurnal_Indonesia-2026-Bab_6.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB)
	Text 08_30000320510025-Eko_Didik_Widianto-Disertasi-Jurnal_Indonesia-2026-Bab_7.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB)
	Text 09_30000320510025-Eko_Didik_Widianto-Disertasi-Jurnal_Indonesia-2026-Bab_8.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB)
	Text 10_30000320510025-Eko_Didik_Widianto-Disertasi-Jurnal_Indonesia-2026-Daftar_Pustaka.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text 11_30000320510025-Eko_Didik_Widianto-Disertasi-Jurnal_Indonesia-2026-Lampiran.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (196kB)

Abstract

Jurnal Indonesia semakin berkembang dan beragam. Perkembangan jurnal ini sebagian besar diterbitkan oleh perguruan tinggi Indonesia dan menawarkan peluang riset bibliometrik secara global. Sebagian besar jurnal tersebut terdaftar di Garba Rujukan Digital (GARUDA), dengan target utama meraih Akreditasi Jurnal Nasional (ARJUNA), mempunyai peringkat tinggi di Science and Technology Index (SINTA) dan terindeks internasional di Scopus sesuai program Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi (DIKTI). Namun, karakteristik jurnal, meliputi profil penerbit, distribusi subjek, dan capaian kinerjanya di SINTA dan Scopus, belum dipahami dengan baik, yang berdampak pada kebijakan pengembangan jurnal yang diambil oleh pengelola maupun pemangku kepentingan cenderung intuitif dan tidak berbasis data.
Penelitian disertasi ini bertujuan mengkaji karakteristik penerbit, subjek cakupan, dan kinerja jurnal Indonesia menggunakan pendekatan bibliometrik dari basis data nasional dan internasional untuk mendukung pengembangan jurnal dengan metric terukur. Model pengembangan jurnal perguruan tinggi yang didukung oleh pengambilan keputusan multikriteria juga diungkap, terutama dalam kesiapan ARJUNA, Penelitian ini mencakup lima subtopik utama, yaitu analisis karakteristik
penerbit dan capaian jurnalnya, karakteristik bidang kajian jurnal, evaluasi kualitas metadata, analisis model pengembangan jurnal perguruan tinggi, dan pendukung keputusan multikriteria untuk evaluasi kesiapan ARJUNA bagi penerbit menggunakan Analytic Network Process (ANP) dan Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS).
Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa institusi pendidikan tinggi mendominasi penerbitan jurnal di Indonesia (71,01%–90,47%) dengan kinerja terbaik pada akreditasi SINTA, inklusi DOAJ, dan peringkat Scopus, di mana Universitas Negeri Semarang tercatat sebagai penerbit terkemuka dengan portofolio subjek beragam. Analisis subjek pada basis data GARUDA dan SINTA mengungkap bahwa sebagian besar fokus jurnal tertuju pada bidang pendidikan, sains, dan sosial, dengan jangkauan subjek di GARUDA yang lebih luas daripada SINTA. Meskipun skor kelengkapan metadata di kedua basis data dinilai baik (5,7 dan 5,2 dari 6), kajian ini menemukan masalah ketidakakuratan data (10,5% dan 0,4%) serta tingkat inkonsistensi nama jurnal dan penerbit antar basis data, masingmasing sebesar 11,2% dan 28,1%.
Model pengembangan jurnal perguruan tinggi di Universitas Diponegoro (Undip) telah meningkatkan jumlah jurnal aktif menjadi 178 jurnal hingga tahun 2024, dengan program pendampingan yang berhasil melampaui target indicator kinerja utama sebesar 6,46% untuk jurnal terakreditasi SINTA dan 12,2% untuk terindeks Scopus, serta meningkatkan kunjungan abstrak dan unduhan artikel hingga 47,14 juta per tahun. Pengambilan keputusan multikriteria dapat mengevaluasi tingkat kesiapan jurnal secara objektif untuk akreditasi berbasis metode ANP dan TOPSIS, dengan mempertimbangkan saling ketergantungan antara 8 kriteria utama dan 39 indikator ARJUNA.
Jurnal Indonesia masih menghadapi tantangan dalam akreditasi nasional dan indeksasi internasional. Kajian ini menghadirkan landasan penguatan tata kelola jurnal Indonesia yang mengintegrasikan validasi metadata yang andal, pemetaan penerbit dan capaian jurnalnya, cakupan bidang ilmu, dan pengambilan keputusan untuk evaluasi jurnal secara konsisten. Melalui luaran ini, riset memberikan kontribusi nyata pada bidang bibliometrik dan pengambilan keputusan dalam peningkatan reputasi jurnal domestik menuju indeksasi global bereputasi tinggi.
Kata Kunci: Komunikasi ilmiah, bibliometrik, pendukung keputusan multikriteria, penerbit jurnal Indonesia, akreditasi jurnal nasional

The landscape of Indonesian journal publishing is expanding and diversifying, with universities serving as the primary publishers. These journals present significant opportunities for global bibliometric research. Most are registered with Garba Rujukan Digital (GARUDA) and aim to achieve National Journal Accreditation (ARJUNA), attain high rankings in the Science and Technology Index (SINTA), and secure international indexing in Scopus, as mandated by the Directorate General of Higher Education (DIKTI). However, the characteristics of journals, including publisher profiles, subject distribution, and their performance in SINTA and Scopus, are not yet well understood, which affects journal development policies taken by managers and stakeholders, often remaining speculative rather than data-based.
This dissertation aims to analyze the characteristics of publishers, subjects, and the performance of Indonesian journals using a bibliometric approach based on national and international databases to support journal development with measurable metrics. Additionally, it incorporates multicriteria decision-making for evaluating journal readiness, particularly in ARJUNA. This dissertation encompasses five main subtopics: analysis of publisher characteristics and achievements; analysis of journal characteristics by subject; metadata quality evaluation; analysis of an institutional journal development model; and multicriteria decision-making for publishers to evaluate their journal readiness in ARJUNA employing the Analytic Network Process (ANP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS).
This findings show that higher education institutions dominate journal publishing in Indonesia (71.01%–90.47%), with the best performance in SINTA accreditation, DOAJ inclusion, and Scopus rankings. Semarang State University is listed as a leading publisher with a diverse subject portfolio. Subject analysis of the GARUDA and SINTA databases reveals that most journals focus on education, social studies, and economics, with GARUDA's subject coverage being broader than SINTA's. Although metadata completeness scores across both databases were rated good (5.7 and 5.2 out of 6), the study found data inaccuracies (10.5% and 0.4%) and inconsistencies in journal and publisher names across databases, at 11.2% and 28.1%, respectively.
The university journal development model at Diponegoro University (Undip) has increased the number of active journals to 178 by 2024. The mentoring program has exceeded the key performance indicator targets of 6,46% and 12,2% for SINTA-accredited and Scopus-indexed journals, respectively. It has increased abstract visits and article downloads to 47.14 million per year. Multi-criteria decision-making has also been applied to consistently evaluate accreditation readiness using the ANP and TOPSIS methods, considering the interdependence among the 8 main criteria and 39 ARJUNA indicators.
Indonesian journals still face challenges in national accreditation and international indexation. This study provides a basis for strengthening Indonesian journal governance by integrating reliable metadata validation, mapping publishers and their journal achievements, coverage of scientific fields, and consistent decision-making in journal evaluation. Through this approach, the study makes scientific contributions to the fields of bibliometrics and decision- making by enhancing the reputation of domestic journals in high-impact global indexing.
Keywords: Scholarly communication, bibliometrics, multicriteria decisionmaking, Indonesian journal publishers, national journal accreditation

Actions (login required)

View Item